Molecular Biophysics Lab
Ben-Gurion University

Oleg Krichevsky

 


Home

Research

People

Current publications

contact us

links


Present 

Structure of DNA Solutions:


DNA structural organization both in bacterial and in eukaryotic cells remains a mystery. While some structural features can be inferred indirectly, there are simply no good experimental techniques which allow to measure chromatin structure at the spatial scales between 10 nm and ~ 1mm. More surprisingly, the structure of bare DNA solutions is not known. There is no good method to measure the structure factor even for solutions of pure DNA in vitro. Static light scattering (SLS) approach does not give reliable data for DNA because of unavoidable presence of dust in solutions. 

Yet polymer structure of DNA solutions should be rather unusual. DNA is a semi-flexible polymer with a very large persistence length/monomer size ratio. Excluded volume interactions in such coils are weak, yet present. Such conditions were termed “marginal” to differentiate them from both “theta” solvents where excluded volume interactions are negligible and “good” solvents, where they are strong. The properties of marginal solutions are predicted to be rather peculiar and not necessarily intermediate between those of theta and good solutions [Schaefer et al, Macromol. 13, 1280 (1980)]. E.g. the correlation length x in semi-dilute marginal polymer solutions should scale like eq1 as a function of monomer concentration c, while in good and theta conditions the dependences eq2 and eq3 are expected respectively. In terms of experiment, the properties of marginal solutions remain a matter of controversy for synthetic polymers. Due to its extraordinarily large persistence length/monomer size ratio, DNA should be an ideal testing ground for the concept of marginal solutions.

In this project we propose a new approach to study the structure of DNA solutions. Our method is based on scanning fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (SFCS) technique: DNA molecules are tagged with fluorescent dyes and DNA solution is scanned fast through the confocal beam. Provided the sample moves fast enough so that DNA segments do not diffuse significantly while in the confocal volume, SFCS just converts spatial correlations into a temporal correlation function. We extract DNA solution structure factor from these measurements. Unlike SLS, our method is not sensitive to dust. Moreover, since fluorescent labels of different colors can be specifically attached to different positions on DNA, our method can provide much more information than SLS.



Environmental Stress Response in Yeast Cells:


system "design", modularity and robustness. (in collaboration with Prof. Dina Raveh, Life Sciences, BGU)

Complex biological and human engineered systems share many of the same design principles since both types of systems are optimized for robust operation and, at the same time, for great evolvability. One such shared design rule is the bow-tie architecture: a set of different inputs to the system converges onto a core machinery hub from which a number of different outputs diverge. In the course of system evolution, the core machinery module is highly conserved allowing for the robust operation of the system, while different input and output modules are modified or added as new challenges arise.

Within this project we use system engineering approach to analyze the environmental stress response (ESR) system of yeast. Indeed, ESR reacts to a number of different inputs - stresses such as DNA damage, heat, oxidative, osmotic, heavy metal, and salt stress, etc, by utilizing appropriate transducer proteins.  We identified core machinery: the circuitry involved in the expression of RPN4, the transcriptional regulator of the proteasome genes, as a main computational unit of the ESR, that integrates different stresses and leads to outputs, down-regulation of protein synthesis genes and an up-regulation of genes involved in protein degradation. In this model, the Rpn4 hub in the biochemical network acts as a switch that changes the cell state into an ESR active state. Indeed, the Rpn4 expression hub possesses the features of a true switch: a combination of a negative feedback regulatory loop (Rpn4 autocatalyzes its transcription) and positive feedback (via upregulation of proteasomes that degrade Rpn4). These are the standard mechanisms of robust control: negative feedback loops tend to keep the expression level of a protein constant minimizing outside interference; whereas positive feedback elements serve as switches in the system behavior by amplifying the effects of changes in system inputs.

Using a combination of molecular biology tools with sensitive fluorescence microscopy of individual yeast cells supplemented by modelling efforts, we study the Rpn4 hub, the properties of its feedback loops, the way it integrates different stress pathways to produce a switch in cell behavior, the robustness and variability of its response within a cell population.


Quantitative Study of Phenotype Variation in Isogenic E. Coli:


A population of genetically identical bacterial cells exhibit a range of phenotypes due to the stochastic nature of gene expression and of segregation of proteins during cell division. The adaptive fitness of intrapopulation variation has been the topic of many recent studies.

In this project we examine the variation in plasmid copy number in the cell population as a measure of cell individuality. There is a cost/benefit trade-off for a cell to harbour a plasmid that depends on the environmental conditions, e.g., the concentration of antibiotics.  We hypothesize that the plasmid copy distribution in a cell population adapts itself to changes in environment. Moreover, we assume that the presence of cells with different plasmid copy numbers helps the population to survive sudden changes in the environmental conditions, as there are will always be some cells in the distribution most adapted to the prevailing conditions.

Here we propose highly sensitive time-resolved imaging technology to directly measure plasmid copy number distribution in individual cells in the bacterial population and to study how these distributions adapt to changes in the environment. The methods for visualization of individual living cells are based on highly sensitive fluorescence microscopy, fluorescence correlation spectroscopy, and the cell sorting using microfluidic devices. Cells harbouring four types of plasmids that differ in their average copy number and in their partitioning properties will be examined.



 Past


Internal dynamics of biological polymers:
DNA molecules, actin filaments.


The problem of polymer dynamics is rather old, going back to the 1930-s.

 

in collaboration with Dr. Anne Bernheim-Groswasser, Chem. Eng. BGU

 

 

How the stochastic thermal motion (diffusion) reveals itself in the dynamics of polymer segments which are bound by connectivity along the chain, by polymer stiffness, by topological constrains, by hydrodynamic and other interactions? The question does not have simple solutions either in theory, nor in computer simulations, and neither in experiments. We have developed an original experimental approach to measure the dynamics of biological polymers, such as DNA at the level of single monomer with high temporal and spatial resolution.

Furthermore, one does not have to rely on classical thermal fluctuations to drive the dynamics of the system. We introduce now molecular motors – little nanomachines – which actively push polymers around at the nanoscale 

 

semiflexible

 

 


 

 

Target location by DNA binding proteins

in collaboration with Prof. Leonid Mirny, MIT

 

This is another classical question going back to 1970, which has been attracting a lot of attention throughout the years. There many DNA binding proteins, most important of which are proteins regulating gene expression, which bind to DNA at very specific positions. The position may be only a few base pairs long, while the whole of DNA is millions base pairs long. How proteins find their specific binding sites on DNA? Do they perform a random search diffusing in 3D and probing nearby DNA sequences? Or they bind nonspecifically and move along DNA performing a 1D search? Most likely proteins combine the two strategies. But what proportion of time they spend in 1D or 3D search, how far they move along DNA, how efficiently they recongnize their specific binding site – all of these are open questions, which we try to address in experiments.

 

 


 

 

Bacterial nucleoid structure and dynamics and its interaction with the membrane

in collaboration with Prof. Itzhak Fishov, Life Sciences, BGU

 

Bacterial DNA (nucleoid) is highly compacted. Once the nucleoid is gently removed from bacteria, it expands almost 100-fold and occupies the volume many times that of bacteria. What forces keep the nucleoid in its condensed form inside the bacteria? What are the main features of nucleoid structure and dynamics? How nucleoid interacts with the bacterial membrane?